| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
21. What's the deal with our cyclopian capsuleers? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's just they couldn't afford the other eye.
- by Grog Aftermath - at 2014.09.19 23:45:00
|
22. Just so you know - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well I was going to say something. But I seem to be lost for words.
- by Grog Aftermath - at 2014.09.19 23:22:00
|
23. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Maybe it's time to lock this thread as it's mainly just going around in circles. Nothing new seems to be coming to the discussion. Other than marital bliss, sorry Sole, couldn't resist.
- by Grog Aftermath - at 2014.09.19 22:50:00
|
24. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Solecist Project wrote: I have no idea where you pick that 30-1 from ... ... but I guess making up excuses to duck out is your greatest ability.... Unlike you, I am not a coward .... Try me ........ *points at Veer* Think he's talking ab...
- by Grog Aftermath - at 2014.09.19 22:36:00
|
25. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Solecist Project wrote: And not only that ... ... I will make it a mutual foreverwar ........ Forever war that was a good book. I get the feeling you two are looking to derail the thread. I would suggest a room, but I'm reluctant to do s...
- by Grog Aftermath - at 2014.09.19 22:23:00
|
26. Are capsuleers slavers? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: CCP Falcon wrote: Crumplecorn wrote: One angle I've read is that ISK is worth so much to non-capsuleers that even grand rewards for the crew of their ships would not make a noticable impact on their wallets, so th...
- by Grog Aftermath - at 2014.09.19 20:01:00
|
27. Gates! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
BoBoZoBo wrote: Derrick Miles wrote: It seems that you're less annoyed with gates and more annoyed at the risk associated with jumping through them. THIS - I could only like it once, so I had to quote it and like my own post with my alt....
- by Grog Aftermath - at 2014.09.19 19:17:00
|
28. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote: Grog Aftermath wrote: ... Why would I renounce something, when I meant it? Because it would save the life of the carebear you have otherwise condemned with your heresy. Our inquisitor who performs the behead...
- by Grog Aftermath - at 2014.09.19 18:12:00
|
29. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote: Grog Aftermath wrote: Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote: Finally, for your pansified heresies against EvE HTFU, we are adding a +1 to the Kill-It-Forward queue, where an innocent carebear will be murdered by us i...
- by Grog Aftermath - at 2014.09.19 17:47:00
|
30. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ireland VonVicious wrote: Grog Aftermath wrote: Ireland VonVicious wrote: The biggest game mechanic issue is that we have no way to fight back with cold hard cash. This puts indy/trade and large new player groups at huge disadvantage. ...
- by Grog Aftermath - at 2014.09.19 17:12:00
|
31. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote: Finally, for your pansified heresies against EvE HTFU, we are adding a +1 to the Kill-It-Forward queue, where an innocent carebear will be murdered by us in hisec and told it was because of you and your heresies ...
- by Grog Aftermath - at 2014.09.19 17:08:00
|
32. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Aivo Dresden wrote: Absolutely Not Analt wrote: Following the principle of Keep It Simple Stupid: What if we just made it cost 50 million ISK per active wardec to dissolve a corp (no active wars = 0 ISK) and require a 24 hour timer before t...
- by Grog Aftermath - at 2014.09.19 15:27:00
|
33. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: For years CCP has gone down the wrong path. Wrong path according to you. It's CCP's business and it's up to them to decide which path they take.
- by Grog Aftermath - at 2014.09.19 15:00:00
|
34. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Veers Belvar wrote: I see 55 pages of back and forth, without addressing the simplest issue here: What is to prevent the target from docking up for a week and playing on alts? Please explain how your mechanic change prevents this solution? ...
- by Grog Aftermath - at 2014.09.19 15:00:00
|
35. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote: If a wardec mechanic is going to exist at all it should be meaningful, that means a defender shouldn't be able to use a simple exploit (drop corp) to dodge it. Now I can debate whether wars should exist at all or ...
- by Grog Aftermath - at 2014.09.19 14:46:00
|
36. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Hiply Rustic wrote: If it's Killyouall's right to put a wardec on Notgonnahappen because sandbox, then it's Notgonnahappen's right to fold their tents because sandbox. That demonstrates the underlying incorrect thou...
- by Grog Aftermath - at 2014.09.19 14:19:00
|
37. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Xuixien wrote: you keep throwing this word "harassment" around. They do that as a roundabout way of trying to make their rabid risk aversion legitimate. Because unless it is legitimate, absolutely nothing justifi...
- by Grog Aftermath - at 2014.09.19 13:51:00
|
38. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Xuixien wrote: you keep throwing this word "harassment" around. while deccing might be considered harassment by some dictionary definitions, it is in no way harassment by any judiciary meaning of the word. no one is really advocating harassin...
- by Grog Aftermath - at 2014.09.19 13:47:00
|
39. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Seneca Auran wrote: Still waiting for the part where the defender has any direct control over the war dec mechanic itself. Or why the defender needs to do x/y/z to protect themselves, but all the attacker needs to do is p...
- by Grog Aftermath - at 2014.09.19 13:36:00
|
40. Dodging Wardecs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Hiply Rustic wrote: It's not nonsense. Someone leaving a corp, or the corp folding, in no way prevents non-consensual PvP. In Hisec all it does is prevent one method for having consequence-free non-consensual PvP, somethi...
- by Grog Aftermath - at 2014.09.19 13:18:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |